Coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming in the EU
Adcock Mike
University of Sheffield, UK
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Risk assessment for genetically-modified
crops: Science, transparency and trust in Australia and the United States
Auer Carol
University of
Connecticut,
Storrs, Connecticut, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Right to Food and
Intellectual Property Rights
Blakeney Michael
Queen Mary, University of London
London, UK
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Ethics of Benefit-Sharing
and its Implications for Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries
Bram de Jonge and Korthals Michiel
Wageningen University
Wageningen, Netherlands
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Consumer Attitudes toward
Animal Food Products Produced using Biotechnology
Butler Leslie J. and McGarry Wolf Marianne
University of California
Davis, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Nutritional Genomics 1:
Biotechnology and the Public Understanding of Science
Castle David (1) and Nola Ries
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Nutritional Genomics 2:
Biotechnology and Regulatory Challenger
Castle David (2) and Nola Ries
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Science and Society: A
scientist’s view of risk communication and consumer perceptions about
Chassy Bruce M.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The FAO International
Treaty’s Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing: Evaluating Changes
in the Governance Framework for Biotechnology, Agricultural Development and
Intellectual Property
Chiarolla Claudio
Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute,
University of London; UK
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Acceptance and attitude
towards genetically modified products in Germany
Christoph Inken B. and Jutta Roosen
University of Kiel, Germany
(Abstract-Back to Top)
SAFE FOODS – Promoting Food
Safety through a New Integrated Risk Analysis Approach for Foods
Cnudde Filip
RIKILT-Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen,
The Netherlands
Harry Kuiper and Hans Marvin
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
(Abstract-Back to Top)
CONSUMERS ACCEPTANCE AND
RISK PERCEPTION OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD IN SPAIN
Costa-Font Montserrat and José M. Gil
CREDA – UPC - IRTA
Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Potential Impact of
Transgenic Crops in Eastern Europe: Insect Resistant Maize and Herbicide
Tolerant Maize and Sugar Beets in the Czech Republic
Demont Matty (1), Wim Daems, Eric Tollens
K.U.Leuven, Belgium
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Farm Level Economics of
Co-existence of Transgenic and Conventional Crops: Oilseed Rape in the Beauce
Region of France
Demont Matty (2), Wim Daems, Eric Tollens
K.U.Leuven, Belgium
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Apomixis
in Rice: The Global Benefits of Introducing Clonal Seed Production
Frisvold George
University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
Kathryn Bicknell
Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
Ross Bicknell
Crop & Food Research, Ltd, Canterbury, New Zealand
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Institutional perspectives on the adoption of genetically modified crops in
developing countries: a comparison of 5 country experiences
Fukuka Paar Sakiko
Harvard University, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Role of Agricultural Biotechnology in America's War on
Terror
Goldstein Alan H.
Lincoln University, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The adoption of
genetically modified insect-resistant Bt maize in Spain and its economic
consequences for farmers: an empirical approach
Gómez-Barbero Manuel & Emilio Rodriguez-Cerezo
DG JRC-Institute for Prospective Technological Studies , Sustainability in
Agriculture
Seville (Spain)
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The
Political Economy of Agricultural Biotechnology Policies in Europe
Graff Gregory D. and David Zilberman
University of California of Berkeley, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Economics of
avoiding GMOs in the German food and feed industry
T. Hirzinger, K.Menrad.
University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan, Science Centre Straubing, Germany
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Scientific and Social Basis For Controversies on Bt
Cotton Yields in India
Kandlikar Milind
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Current
contribution of four biotechnologies to New Zealand’s primary sector
William Kaye-Blake, Caroline Saunders, and
Martin Emanuelsson
Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
(Abstract-Back to Top)
A Case for Agricultural
Biotechnology in Africa:he Policy and Regulatory Processes
Kisamba-Mugerwa
International Service for National Agricultural
Wilberforce, Ethiopia
(Abstract-Back to Top)
A private Ordering to the Public
Problems of Anticommons
Kieff Scott f. and Troy A. Parades
Stanford University, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Ethical Impacts of Uncertainties of Nutrigenomics
Korthals Michiel and Rixt Komduur
Wageningen University, Netherlands
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Impact of Biotech Labeling on Consumers’ Purchasing
Behavior: A Case Study of Vegetable Oils in Nanjing, China
Lin
William, Francis Tuan, Yingchun Dai and Funing Zhong
Economic Research Service-USDA, USA and Nanjing Agricultural University, China
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Use of Spatial Models to Examine Producer Adoption of One- and Two-Toxin Bt
Cotton and Pyrethroids to Manage a Mobile Pest Of Corn, Cotton, And Soybean: Why
Structured Refuge Requirements May Not Be Needed to Promote Long-Run Economic
Efficiency
Livingston Michael J.
ERS-USDA; USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Best Response to GMOs for
Developing Countries
Luc Veyssiere
Iowa State University; USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Analysis of consumer
cost-benefit valuations in purchasing GM food with potentially improved
attributes
Marin Floriana and Lucia Martinelli
Istituto
Agrario San Michele all’Adige, Italy
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Biofortification of
Maize to Reduce Vitamin A Deficiency: Application to South Africa
Meyers William
H. and Helen Jensen
University of Missouri-Columbia, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
|
Valuing Intellectual Property Rights in an Imperfectly
Competitive Market: A Tobacco Bio-Pharming Application
Mills
Bradford F. and
Genti Kostandini
Virginia Tech, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Development of Insect Resistance Management STRATEGIES FOR RELEASE OF BT
MAIZE ACROSS KENYA AND FOR POST RELEASE RESISTANCE MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
Mulaa
Margaret
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Kenya
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Coexistence: the last fight to be (GMOs) free?
Niespolo Fabio
Scuola superiore Sant'Anna,Italy
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Estimating social welfare impacts of Bt maize under different adoption
scenarios
Nillesen Eleonora and Justus Wesseler
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Sara Scatasta
Center for European Economic Research (ZEW), Germany
(Abstract-Back to Top
Consumer attitudes towards
different applications of genetic modification in livestock production
Novoselova Tatiana and Miranda P.M. Meuwissen
Ruud B.M. Huirne and
Ivo A.van der Lans
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Role of Individuals in a Knowledge Based Economy: Analysis of
Attitudes towards
Genetically Modified Products with Health Benefits
Olubobokun Simbo(1) and Peter W.B. Phillips
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Measuring Consumer
Attitudes towards Innovative Products with Health Benefits: A
Psychological Approach
Olubobokun Simbo(2)
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Consumer-based
Barriers to Trade: An Interdisciplinary Approach used to Evaluate
Consumer Attitudes towards Products with Perceived Health Impact
Olubobokun Simbo(3) and Peter W.B. Phillips
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Bt Cotton in China:
Are Secondary Insect Infestations Offsetting the Benefits in Farmer
Fields?
Scott Rozelle
Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of
California, Davis, USA
Ruifa Hu, Jikun Huang, Hai Lin
Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Eight Years of Bt
Cotton in Farmer Fields in China: Has the Bollworm Population Developed
Resistance?
Carl Pray
Rutgers University, USA
Per Pinstrup-Anderson
Scott Rozelle
Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of
California, Davis, USA
Ruifa Hu, Jikun Huang, Hai Lin
Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Regulation, Spread
and Public Acceptance of Crop Biotechnology- A Developing Country
Perspective
Purvi Mehta-Bhatt
South Asia Biosafety Program
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Optimal Refuge
Strategies to Manage the Resistance Evolution of Pests:
A Case Study of Bt Cotton in China
Fangbin Qiao
University of California at Davis; USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Co-Existence Costs
under German Regulation – Case Studies of Bt Maize and HT Oilseed Rape
D. Reitmeier & K. Menrad
University of Applied Sciences of Weihenstephan, Denemark
(Abstract-Back to Top)
A Biotechnology
Summer Camp for High School Students:A Model Strategy for Economic and
Workforce Development At the Early Stage of Higher Education
Saliceti-Piazza Lorenzo & Rosa Buxeda
University of Puerto Rico,
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Industrial
Biotechnology Learning Center:A Key Strategy for Economic Development
Through Workforce Training in Biotechnology Manufacturing
Saliceti-Piazza Lorenzo & Rosa
Buxeda
University of Puerto Rico,
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Regulating Risk in
a Developing Economy
Satterfield Terre and Milind Kandlikar
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Real options and the Adoption of Transgenic Crops:
an intertemporal perspective
Sara Scatasta
Center for European Economic Research (ZEW), Germany
Nillesen Eleonora and Justus Wesseler
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The future of
genetically modified crops in developing countries
Schmidt Harald and Harald Schmidt
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London
(Abstract-Back to Top)
From Farming to
Pharming –
Policy challenges for the next generation of agricultural biotechnology
Spök Armin
Inter-University Research Centre for Technology, Work and Culture
Graz, Austria
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Monsanto’s
Adventures in Zulu Land: Output and Labour Effects of GM Maize And
Minimum Tillage
Colin Thirtle,
Marnus Gouse and Jenifer Piesse
University of Pretoria
Kings College London and University of Stellenbosch
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Production
Technology, Product Attributes, and Consumers Willingness to Pay:
Implicit Price Estimation Using Choice Modeling
Thomassin Paul J.
McGill University;
Quebec, Canada
Matthew Straub
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Ottawa, Ontario
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Reducing
costs caused by isolation requirements between GM and non-GM potato
fields – a method based on GIS
Tuomisto Jussi Hanna Huitu
MTT, Agrifood Research Finland
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Bollgard II
Field Trials in Burkina Faso: Measuring How Bt Cotton Benefits West
African Farmers
Vitale Jeffrey, Harvey Glick, John Greenplate, Mourad Abdennadher
and Oula Traore
Monsanto, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
The Economic
Impacts of Monsanto’s Bollgard II in West Africa: Empirical Evidence
from Burkina Faso
Vitale Jeffrey, Harvey Glick and John Greenplate
Monsanto, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Public versus
Private Benefits: Consumer Generation Genetically Response to Second-
Modified Apples in Chile
Wahl Thomas I.,
Jill J. McCluskey and Ricardo I. Diaz-Carcamo
Washington
State University, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
Comparing the
Potential Costs and Benefits of Biosafety Regulatory Frameworks:
Consumer and Producer Perceptions of Transgenic Banana Varieties in
Uganda
Wesseler Justus , Enoch Kikulwe and Jose Falck-Zepeda
Wageningen University,The Netherlands
International Food Policy Research Institute; Washington DC, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
A Proposition in
California to Ban Growing Genetically Engineered Crops Has the Opposite
Effect
Marianne McGarry Wolf
California Polytechnic State University, California, USA
(Abstract-Back to Top)
|